2026年10月16日 星期五

If these numbers don’t generate a blue wave, nothing will.在美國政治中,「藍色浪潮」(Blue Wave)指的是民主黨(Democratic Party)在選舉中贏得壓倒性勝利的現象。

 War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Inflation is down. Or at least that’s what Donald Trump says.


I wrote yesterday, following the release of the latest Consumer Price Index, that Trump had snatched inflation defeat from the jaws of victory. Now the Bureau of Labor Statistics has released its other inflation measure, the Producer Price Index, which measures wholesale prices, and it was even worse, running substantially hotter than forecasters expected.


My basic point — that Trump inherited a relatively benign inflation picture and threw that inheritance away with his tariffs and war — is even clearer from the PPI than the CPI. And the PPI is often a leading indicator of future consumer prices, so there’s no relief visible in the near future.


There’s no mystery about what’s going on: it’s mostly about the prices of petroleum products, especially diesel. Diesel prices have risen more than twice as much as gasoline prices over the past year — and the rising price of diesel cascades through the economy, raising business costs and driving inflation across a wide range of products.


But didn’t Trump just make a deal to buy Russian diesel? Yes, and it was shameful. It was also ineffective: Even if Putin can deliver the fuel, which is doubtful — the Ukrainians have resumed their strikes on Russian refineries — the quantity was much too small to make much difference. Indeed, wholesale diesel prices remain significantly higher than they were at the height of the shooting war with Iran, let alone before Trump started that war.


In any case, Trump’s response to the dismal inflation news — even worse for him politically because of the extravagant promises he made in the past — is denial: He keeps insisting that inflation is way down. Is he deliberately lying, or does he truly not know what’s going on? We shouldn’t rule out the latter possibility. Bear in mind that Trump doesn’t read, and he certainly doesn’t read BLS data releases. And while he presumably has aides who do know what the numbers say, are they willing to tell him things he doesn’t want to hear? Probably not.


Then again, I may be making a category error. As far as I can tell, Trump doesn’t believe that there is such a thing as objective truth, there’s only what he wants to be true. Hence my Orwell reference at the top of this piece. Trump doesn’t have the full powers of a totalitarian ruler, but often behaves as if he did (and is enabled in that behavior by almost the entire GOP.) And Orwell wrote about the mutability of history under totalitarian regimes: "If the Leader says of such and such an event, ‘It never happened’ – well, it never happened."


In this case what never happened was surging inflation.


But while Trump is surrounded by lackeys willing to deny reality, according to the latest Fox News poll, 55 percent of voters say that inflation is “not at all” under control — and that includes 30 percent of Republicans.


Inflation won’t be the only issue in the midterms. That same Fox News poll shows voters even more concerned about “corruption in government.” But that is also not exactly a source of Republican strength.


If these numbers don’t generate a blue wave, nothing will.


I have another day of playing academic statesman at Oxford, so that’s it for today.


在美國政治中,「藍色浪潮」(Blue Wave)指的是民主黨(Democratic Party)在選舉中贏得壓倒性勝利的現象。這通常意味著民主黨不僅贏得總統大選,還同時掌控了國會兩院(參議院與眾議院),或者在地方州長與議會選舉中取得重大進展。 [1, 2, 3]
這項政治術語的核心概念與影響如下:

1. 顏色編碼的由來
美國政黨在媒體報導中習慣以顏色作為區隔: [1]
  • 藍色: 代表民主黨。
  • 紅色: 代表共和黨。
    因此,當民主黨大獲全勝、政治版圖大面積「由紅轉藍」時,就被形象地稱為「藍色浪潮」。(相對地,若共和黨大勝則稱為「紅色浪潮」)。
    [1, 2, 3]

2. 「全面執政」的政策影響
當美國迎來藍色浪潮,民主黨實現全面執政時,通常會對政策和經濟走向帶來顯著轉變: [1]
  • 推動進步派法案: 執政黨能更順利地通過重大法案,例如擴大社會福利、加強氣候變遷與綠能補貼、強化科技與環境監管等。
  • 財政與稅收政策: 民主黨通常傾向調升企業稅與富人稅以資助政府支出,同時也可能提高基本薪資。
  • 人事任命順利: 由於掌控參議院,總統提名聯邦法官、大法官或重要內閣官員時,不容易遭到反對黨阻撓。 [1, 2, 3, 4]

3. 對金融市場的衝擊
在選舉期間,市場對「藍色浪潮」的預期往往會引發波動: [1]
  • 短期恐慌: 由於市場擔憂民主黨加稅或加強企業監管,股市在選舉前後可能出現反射性下跌或劇烈震盪。
  • 長期效應: 隨著新政府大規模財政振興方案或基礎建設計劃的推動,經濟若持續復甦,股市多能逐步消化稅率衝擊並重回常軌。 [1, 2, 3]
维基百科
在美國選舉中,浪潮(英語:wave)是指某一政黨取得重大勝利的選舉。根據自2000年以來使用的「紅州與藍州」顏色編碼慣例,浪潮選舉通常被稱為「藍色浪潮」或「紅色 ...
工商時報
Oct 11, 2020 — 摩根士丹利上周報告指出若民主黨11月初總統與國會選舉均勝出,重奪參眾兩院控制權而出現所謂「藍潮」(blue wave),美股在年底前走勢將有如雲霄飛車那樣波動不止。 摩根士丹利的研究團隊預期在藍潮下,會讓美股穩定往上走的態勢暫時逆轉,直到行情在明年初修正回來為...
凤凰网财经
Oct 13, 2026 — 美银认为,民主党大获全胜的蓝色浪潮(Blue Wave)将让美股面临一轮抛售。 民调天平彻底偏移. 分析师预计,美国总统特朗普所属共和党将在中期选举遭遇 ...
MacroMicro
Jan 7, 2021 — 我們想讓你知道的是美國喬治亞州參議員第二次選舉,意外迎來民主黨全面執政的藍色浪潮!科技監管、調升最低基本薪資等政策,即將帶給市場預期衝擊?M平方從中長線基本面與...
百度百科
"Blue Wave" is a U.S. political term referring to a situation in which the Democratic Party leads or achieves a sweeping victory i...
ABC7 Bay Area
Definition: "Blue wave" refers to a theorized Democratic sweep of the House and Senate in the 2018 midterm elections driven by hig...
Quora
Sep 30, 2022 — What is the difference between a blue wave and red wave in the context of the US presidential elections? Profile photo for Quora U...
www.chinatimes.com
Oct 12, 2020 — 摩根士丹利最新報告指出,若民主黨11月初總統與國會選舉均勝出,重奪參眾兩院控制權而出現所謂「藍潮」(blue wave),美股將呈現先蹲後跳,在年底前震盪走低,但在明年初修正向上。 股市之所以會因藍潮而波動,主要是民主黨倡議調高企業稅率,加上共和黨可能因民主黨...