Bayley’s rippling allusiveness, from Tolstoy to the Teletubbies, is hard to match. But the best of this year’s books about dementia — and there will be many more in years to come — also invoke literature, art and pop culture to help explain what science and medicine, in all their lab-coated well-meaningness, cannot fully.
Title Tears for LeBron James and Michael Jordan
The two dominant players of their eras are linked by emotional Father’s Day victories and for denying the Warriors’ claim to the title of “best team ever.”
沈建德
（422）台灣人軟弱被啃也不會叫，難怪今日22Ｋ。不知還會慘多久？
昨天3則新聞，今天主流媒體沒有反應，很令人感慨：
（1）杜正勝回憶當年他拆蔣廟招牌，台北縣市吊車業者不敢受僱，只好找嘉義大吊車北上才解決。這不是顯示台灣人無用嗎？
（2）沈呂巡在美說，蔣日記提到228要用「撫慰」，而非血洗、屠殺台灣菁英。但，若是「撫慰」，基隆港屠夫劉雨卿，高雄港劊子手彭孟緝屠殺市民染紅海水係抗命，為何沒槍斃反而都升官？而明年就70年了，台灣人有何實際行動？
（3）宋楚瑜秀其家傳「秘件」給蔡英文看，騙她1949年50萬敗兵逃亡來台受台灣人供養是在保衛台灣，要感激。蔡居然點頭稱是，說使她有「歷史感」！
另外1949年流亡台灣的敗兵運金，宋說用在發展台灣經濟、推動九年義務教育（見2003/12/29聯合報），這和新黨主席相同，只差沒說要還給中國，好讓關係斷乾淨，不知蔡英文的「歷史感」如何？
蔣介石運金之事2004-01-19【台灣日報】拙文「搶台灣，公投金條沉重表白」已清楚說明，去年7月4日本fb第284篇也有敘述，金條全部關餉，否則軍隊不願拿紙鈔為中華民國賣命。證據如下：
（1）1949年9月7日美國參院外交主席康納利指責蔣介石下台還私運金條，次日顧維鈞回答說是戰費不是私用。
（2）1950年6月7日中央銀行報告，運台金條375萬兩，到是日剩下54萬兩，只敷3個月。
(3)前「主計長」周宏濤說，金條1950年9月發餉就發完了。
目前央行存有當年金條，係台灣人做牛做馬拼經濟使金融穩定，然後以新台幣向中華民國軍人買回。
1950年9月以後沒金條發餉，當年度國防預算立刻就佔總預算90.0%，1960年度為74.7%，1970年度為60.1%，祕密國防預算佔36.2%以上還不計算在內（前主計長韋端論文）。
可見台灣人辛勞所得都在養「外省人」軍公教，1949年被他們吃垮以致4萬換1元還不說（「前總統」嚴家淦1949年書面聲明）。誰該感謝誰？「他們」歪曲史實，若我們不揭穿謊言，很多人不知道，以為是中國人養台灣。
圖：
2004年「台灣國臨時政府」成員，從台北、台中、台南、高雄，追著連宋在他們競選總部活動時抗議「乞丐趕廟公」，竊據台灣、屠殺台灣說是保護台灣。
圖為2004年2月13的高雄場。
Secondly, more ambitious critics who every other year collect their
magazine articles into volumes with allusive scholarly titles--
The Undiscovered Country, that kind of thing.
Teletubbies
- title
- 《名詞》(1)表題，題名 (2)本，出版物 (3)【映画】字幕 (4)称号，肩書，爵位 (5)【法律】所有権 (6)選手権，タイトル (7)権利
NOUN
In property law, a title is a bundle of rights in a piece of property in which a party may own either a legal interest or equitable interest. The rights in the bundle may be separated and held by different parties. It may also refer to a formal document, such as adeed, that serves as evidence of ownership. Conveyance of the document may be required in order to transfer ownership in the property to another person. Title is distinct from possession, a right that often accompanies ownership but is not necessarily sufficient to prove it. In many cases, both possession and title may be transferred independently of each other. For real property, land registration and recording provide public notice of ownership information.
In United States law, typically evidence of title is established through title reports written up by title insurance companies, which show the history of title (property abstract and chain of title) as determined by the recorded public record deeds;[1] the title report will also show applicable encumbrances such as easements, liens, or covenants.[2] In exchange for insurance premiums, the title insurance company conducts a title search through public records and provides assurance of good title, reimbursing the insured if a dispute over the title arises.[3] In the case of vehicle ownership, a simple vehicle title document may be issued by a governmental agency.
The main rights in the title bundle are usually:
- Exclusive possession
- Exclusive use and enclosure
- Acquisition
- Conveyance, including by bequest
- Access easement
- Hypothecation
- Partition
The rights in real property may be separated further, examples including:
- Water rights, including riparian rights and runoff rights
- In some U.S. states, water rights are completely separate from land—see prior appropriation water rights
- Mineral rights
- Easement to neighboring property, for utility lines, etc.
- Tenancy or tenure in improvements
- Timber rights
- Farming rights
- Grazing rights
- Hunting rights
- Air rights
- Development rights to erect improvements under various restrictions
- Appearance rights, often subjected to local zoning ordinances and deed restrictions
Possession is the actual holding of a thing, whether or not one has any right to do so. The right of possession is the legitimacy of possession (with or without actual possession), the evidence for which is such that the law will uphold it unless a better claim is proven. The right of property is that right which, if all relevant facts were known (and allowed), would defeat all other claims. Each of these may be in a different person.
For example, suppose A steals from B, what B had previously bought in good faith from C, which C had earlier stolen from D, which had been an heirloom of D's family for generations, but had originally been stolen centuries earlier (though this fact is now forgotten by all) from E. Here A has the possession, B has an apparent right of possession (as evidenced by the purchase), D has the absolute right of possession (being the best claim that can be proven), and the heirs of E, if they knew it, have the right of property, which they cannot prove. Good title consists in uniting these three (possession, right of possession, and right of property) in the same person(s).
The extinguishing of ancient, forgotten, or unasserted claims, such as E's in the example above, was the original purpose of statutes of limitations. Otherwise, title to property would always be uncertain.
allusive
adj.
Containing or characterized by indirect references: an allusive speech.
allusively al·lu'sive·ly adv.
allusiveness al·lu'sive·ness n.
沒有留言:
張貼留言